It's long been a fantasy and a theory of people worldwide for decades. What if humans or some other race of beings somehow were using the moon as a base of operations? And now a recent photo has raised several questions among those who believe the US or some other world (or off-world) power may be using the moon as a base of operations. The pictures were taken from Google and suggest a series of rowed structures that look almost like a garden in a grid pattern. But the sizes of the structures we're looking at are most likely far larger than any ordinary garden. Could a moon-base really exist on the Lunar surface?
The images depict nine structures that stretch out into the distance being approximately 30 feet in length and having a number of what appear to be ridges on them or formations. But while it appears to be a fairly blurry representation of some sort of operation on the moon, if you look over to the side of the image it becomes apparent that the structures are more likely a simple pixelation error on the images. Google images such as these can be seen in several areas even on its wildly popular Google Earth. But others, such as Steven Dean have suggested it may be something more.
The moon has always been an incredibly compelling point of interest for those tending to believe that the world around us is not as it seems to the average person in the world. Of all the bodies surrounding our Sun, few have been written about in both science fiction and poetry more than the moon aside from possibly Mars. So when the idea of a moon base suddenly arises, and evidence of that base comes in the form of unintentionally taken photographs, it seems like the perfect excuse to expound on the possibilities for the future or even the present.
And though this moon base photo may have a mundane explanation are there places such structures could exist where they couldn't be seen from Earth or by orbiting satellites? In fact, there are.
In the Northern pole of the moon there are several rocky formations where the light of day never reaches. There are several craters, some of adequate size to fit permanent installations in which the sun's rays have never penetrated. And though the far side of the moon is typically referred incorrectly to the "dark side" (since the sun's rays do regularly shine on this far side as well) there is a side of the moon that is always facing away from the Earth as it rotates in a synchronized fashion to how it orbits the Earth. This far side of the moon, which never sees the Earth is likely a primary candidate for an interesting moon base.
But who would build such a base? With our current known level of technology, such an endeavor would be impossible to keep secret. But it has been suggested that with secret superior technology, or with the assistance of some outside force, it is certainly not beyond the realm of possibility.
Scientists from Germany have reported that they may have made a breakthrough after curing one man's infection of HIV. The man was infected with HIV and suffering from leukemia of the immune system. As the virus feeds on the immune system, the scientists decided to eliminate it and thus cure the man. But the potential cure has many drawbacks as well and many are suggesting this is not the cure the scientific community has been searching for all these years.
Through high doses of chemotherapy, scientists were able to eliminate the man's immune system and then transplant it back to him with stem cells. As a result, the man's destroyed immune system was recreated by additional stem cell transplants and the cancer was eliminated through the same process. As a result, in one fell swoop the German scientists were able to cure not only the man's HIV but his cancer as well. But there is a down side to this therapy as well.
The patient's DNA contained a rare specific gene designed to be extremely resistant to the HIV virus. This means the stem cells introduced into his body had help. And now after three years since the initial treatments began the patient is free of any trace of HIV. While it is far from a cure, the use of stem cells to reconstitute the immune system certainly opens doors for potential future innovations in medicine. But the idea of completely removing a person's immune system is certainly enough to leave many people hesitant about using the treatment as it could be in some cases even worse than the disease itself.
And it's not simply the removal of the immune system that could be a problem. The very system designed to eliminate a person's immune system is extremely harsh on a patient's body. In the end this "cure" will likely take research a step further, but not necessarily cure most patients of the illness. Additionally, the patients would have to meet a specific genetic criteria that is present in less than 1% of the total population.
The immune system is one of the most important parts of the human body. When it's in proper working condition, patients are able to fully reap its benefits. When it does not, work, however, even something as simple as the common cold can wreak havoc on the body. While this experiment does not mean a cure for HIV has been discovered, the disease could in theory result in future experiments that could result in such a cure at some future date.
Of course one of the major controversies about the treatment is that it uses stem cells. Stem cells have been controversial because they were once thought only to come from fetuses. However, in time, scientists were able to discover ways to extract stem cells without the need for controversy by extracting them from adults, umbilical cords, and even amniotic fluid.
Will we soon be living in a world where HIV is nothing more than a thing of the past? And what other diseases will scientists be able to cure with similar treatments?
For the longest time, physicists had to contend with strictly guided Newtonian physics that suggested all time was linear and gave the troubling idea of predestination. But then as Einstein tested his theories of the universe in the brilliant display of atomic power, we discovered that time was not linear as had been once proposed, but was in fact very relative given the movement of an object. Hence, time travel was not only suggested, it was promised.
Unfortunately, it is also not easy. As we pick up speed, we are actually slowing time down. A year for us as we travel at close to the speed of light could be ten or twenty years on Earth. But by the same respect, if we were to travel faster than the speed of light, we would eventually be able to travel back in time. Of course this promise also came with a very important disclaimer. We simply cannot travel faster than the speed of light with our current understanding of physics. It's this exact same disclaimer that results in us being unable to suddenly jump to another dimension.
But there are other places in the universe where physics gets very strange. Black Holes, for one, seem to have an effect on light and could in theory even have an effect on time. But traveling to a black hole without protection beyond what we currently understand could result in being completely atomized and ripped into strands a hundred trillion miles long. And of course this isn't very promising at all if you want to see dinosaurs or watch Shakespeare's debut.
So will we ever be able to hop in a ship and travel faster than the speed of light without subjecting ourselves to the dangers of black holes? Or will we develop a ship capable of traveling into the heart of a black hole without being crushed and ripped to shreds? There have been dozens of other solutions, including the now famous Tipler Cylinder, but each has its own problems. Problems on the scale of the Tipler Cylinder require that a time machine would have to be infinitely long in either direction and spin incredibly fast in order to travel back in time. Such an endeavor would take an infinitely long period of time and require an infinite amount of energy to spin. It would be easier to just reverse the process of everything in the universe to achieve backwards time travel, in other words.
Of course in the meantime, we may develop devices that find a workaround system. If not traveling backwards through the whole universe, perhaps it would be possible to travel backwards in time on Earth. You may be surprised, but there actually have been several time travelers that have come from our past into the future. Russian cosmonaut Sergei Adveyev holds the current world record for time travel, having traveled almost a quarter of a second into the future. Of course this time wasn't exactly noticed by Adveyev, and he was able to do it merely by orbiting Earth for long enough.
So if you want to travel into the future, it might be possible if you move fast enough in space. But if you want to come back to this moment? Use it well, as you will never get it back. That is, unless science discovers a new way of looking at the universe.
New Years Eve saw the appearance of a very strange sight in the streets and fields around a small town in Arkansas. Amid the litter of revelry from the night before, city officials found that thousands of dead blackbirds had been found to have fallen from the sky around town, but no one knows why. What do you do when thousands of blackbirds mysteriously fall dead from the sky? Investigators are scrambling to discover if this is a new dangerous disease or if it will remain an unsolved mystery like another one in 2010.
In 2010 we first brought you coverage of a story of hundreds of starlings that fell out of the sky and into one woman's garden over the course of only a few seconds. The woman came home that night to investigate and was horrified to find hundreds of the birds simply laying on the ground outside her house. The birds were so numerous she found it difficult to move into her house without nudging any of them. Fearing a potential disease outbreak, she phoned the authorities and an animal control official was dispatched to her house where several samples were collected and more than a few tests were made. The tests were the same in every case. The birds had not been poisoned, showed o signs of distress, and had simply died unexpectedly of blunt trauma while flying in midair. Of course no one saw anything that ran into the birds and apparently neither did the birds themselves. Some speculated that an invisible wall had sprung up and soon talk of a UFO was brought up. I remember contacting several people trying to get firsthand information about whether it could be a sudden hailstorm, thoroughly convinced I had solved the puzzle over the official explanation of just where these birds were coming from and why they were dying so suddenly out of nowhere.
Karen Rowe, a commission ornithologist for the city said that this sort of thing has happened elsewhere, but the statement is perhaps accidentally misleading as while it does happen occasionally elsewhere it is actually extremely rare. The whole reason this is news is because an ultra rare and very troubling thing has happened again. Of course there's also the fact that Rowe has the all important job of ensuring panic doesn't set in on the town it took place in.
Fortunately for us all this sort of thing did happen before without any noticeable consequence for the town it took place in. But what could be the explanation? And could this mass dying of birds have anything to do with the incident that happened in Julie Knight's garden? With any luck this latest incident will prove to be just as harmless and isolated as the other.
The official explanation is still being explored, but several of those proposed to make the event seem more normal are also fairly unlikely. Included in these theories is one suggesting that the birds died as a result of sudden fireworks explosions resulting in trauma. If this were the case, then fireworks all over the world would be regularly causing mass heart attacks in birds resulting in thousands of deaths every year. Shortly thereafter the event would be occurring regularly at the fourth of July and New Years. Another suggestion was a sudden hailstorm. While I had proposed this in the Knight case, as this happened all over the city in the middle of winter it seems less likely that it could happen without evidence of the storm being left behind.
The evidence seems to suggest that all of these birds interacted with something that resulted in their deaths, but it didn't affect anything else. As other birds didn't seem affected by it, this suggests possibly a disease that deals exclusively with blackbirds or even more likely a fast acting toxin that the birds flew into while in a flock. As some started dying off they dispersed and eventually were also claimed by the toxin. If no toxins are discovered in the bodies, however, the mystery will only deepen. Perhaps they flew into a pocket where there was increased carbon dioxide. The trauma could have been caused by the fall as they returned to Earth.
Hopefully in due time this mystery will be solved.
It's being called the Aflockalypse in some circles, a sign of the apocalypse in others, and a massive coincidence by a diminishing number as the deaths of thousands of blackbirds is now being joined by other species who all seem to be dying in mass numbers. The idea of animals of a specific species dying off en masse seems too much to just be coincidence to a growing number who are proclaiming it to be evidence of everything from a pre-show to 2012 to government experiments. And with crabs, other birds, and other fish joining the mix, some experts say they expect this to just be the beginning. 
On new year's day residents of Beebee, AK were horrified when they stepped outside and spotted lying dead in their yards up to hundreds of birds over a short distance. After a while the tally was counted up and they discovered that several thousand birds had been killed somehow in the night, the result of some unknown physical trauma to their bodies. Mere days prior hundreds of thousands of kettle fish had washed up on the shores just north of there having died of equally mysterious causes. And now another mass die off of birds has been reported just south of Beebee.
Skeptics have pointed to the numbers of experts, suggesting that birds die in massive numbers about 14 to 16 times every 20 years from unknown causes. Of course this is a far cry from the several mass die offs being reported in only a few days. And it isn't just birds this time, but other species as well. Are we just specially tuned in to the subject of bird deaths? Or is it possible there could be something more? If the former is the case, experts are saying to prepare for more reports of mass die offs in the coming days.
Thousands of fish are likewise dying off in massive numbers the world over all over the world including several in places such as New Zealand, the UK, and Japan. In Louisiana hundreds of birds reportedly died just days after the first die off was reported in Beebee. And this is just the first few days after the first incident. At this rate it's expected we will be abandoning the "coincidence" theory fairly soon if these deaths continue to make headlines and continue to occur worldwide.
Last year we brought you coverage of a strange incident involving hundreds of Starlings suddenly dropping dead in one woman's yard under mysterious circumstances. At the time we were perplexed by the theories proposed to explain it away almost as much as the incidents themselves. Fortunately in that case there were no follow up mass animal deaths to suggest something larger was going on. This was not, however, the case in the Beebee incident. Possible culprits proposed are generally a mix between a coincidence and the explosion of fireworks startling the birds and causing them to plummet to the ground, a fast acting disease, a cloaked alien ship that resulted in the birds slamming into a solid object they could not see, the birds fighting one another and even military testing of the HAARP system to affect bird flight patterns. Each explanation has its faults and its qualities. But none of them thus far have truly closed what is becoming an ever more perplexing case.
Whatever you may think of the mystery of strange aerial phenomena, there has been quite a bit of coverage of so called mystery missiles in the past few months. In November the devices seemed to be popping up all over the world, each one as enigmatic as the last. And as the numbers piled up many people proposed everything from military test vehicles to secret satellite launches. But after a brief lull at the end of December, a new contrail sighting has cropped up that seemingly has no explanation. 
The video taken by witnesses shows a single white stripe flying up into the sky and disappearing at a point. Unlike traditional aircraft, the contrail doesn't appear to move at all horizontally across the sky, instead favoring a perfectly vertical trajectory into the atmosphere. But even as this UFO video is being given the silent treatment by a media now more concerned with massive animal die-offs, some are speculating that this is further evidence that seems to vindicate the strange series of missile sightings at the end of last year. But what is it?
The object appears to be distant, and in the middle of the desert it's possible it could have gone up without being seen at all. But witnesses with a cell phone video taped the object as it shot up into the sky and this footage made it to the hands of a news team dedicated to getting the truth on the matter. As they showed the footage to the world for the first time, the theories behind what it could be quickly started pouring in.
Could it be a military spy plane? A military test vehicle with the ability to move straight up into the air is nothing new, but the speed, height, and incline seem to suggest a rocket propulsion system. The fact that it leaves behind a fluffy white contrail could suggest fuel accelerants used in jets and rockets. If it's a test vehicle, it is possible its driver could be a computer guidance system, and the passenger intended for it could be a weapons payload. Missile tests are not generally broadcast and depending on the type of missile may actually violate international treaties. And therefore, when nations test these weapons it is usually kept under strict secrecy. But then would such a system be tested during broad daylight?
What about a private rocket system? It's no secret that corporations are showing quite a bit of interest in the space program. And with an increased dependence on GPS systems and satellites, there's no need to get materials into space than ever. But why the secrecy? Would it really be more difficult to simply lie about the cargo onboard the rocket than to build your own and secretly launch it? And what could warrant such a clandestine operation? And as with any question when dealing with corporate entities, if there is no profit in it, it's less likely they would engage in it.
Could a flying saucer be the cause? Rather than call the object a UFO (it is, after all unidentified and clearly flying) let's just come right out and ask if the device could be a flying saucer or similar craft of unconventional Earthly origin. But if this was the case, why would it need to leave a massive contrail behind it? Witnesses worldwide have seen these objects and reported that they do not leave behind contrails. In fact, the objects don't seem to leave behind any evidence of any kind often, and certainly don't have to use conventional rocket fuel to fly through the air. At least not as far as we know. If it was alien in origin, which is admittedly a sort of catch-all theory, why aren't more of these objects seen leaving behind a plume of smoke when they leave Earth?
So could it be a conventional aircraft viewed at a specific angle making the illusion that it's a missile? Look at the video and try to imagine what angle the object would have to be at in order to create an illusion like this. Then take into consideration that the object was spotted by multiple witnesses from different angles and all could agree on one central fact -that it was entirely unexplainable.
In an incredible piece of information from the amazing world of animals, Chaser the Border Collie has been studied at the University of Woffard (not Woofard) where they discovered that he understands the names of several hundred objects and can even understand the words for acquiring them. The Collie is one of the masters of language, but is said to have the vocabulary prowess of a typical human being during early development. Now if only we could teach him to "speak." 
Chaser has been taught the names of several objects including typical nouns of several objects and then the words for what to do with them. John Pilley and Alliston Reid gave Chaser extensive training on words and their meanings and now the border Collie can not only pick these objects out in a lineup, but can understand more complex commands that make "sit" "stay" and "roll over" look like child's play. The researchers were looking to understand what the limits of dog training could be when it came to words and commands. What they discovered was astounding. Try as they might, they couldn't find any limit to how many words a dog could learn given sufficient training. By the end, they had taught Chaser over 1,022 words and he showed no signs of slowing down. Eventually, the test was concluded only because they ran out of time.
It's no question that dogs are incredibly intelligent animals. In addition to being able to understand basic shapes and objects, they apparently can understand. They would even combine the preset names and commands together to see if they could figure out what he would do. After extensive training they found that Chaser not only understood the objects, but also more complex and abstract concepts behind them. The true weight of Chaser's intelligence was astounding both to Pilley and Alliston, but left many questions still unanswered. How far could an animal's intelligence be taken? If given the proper stimuli, how complex could the commands get? Could seeing eye dogs and other service animals one day be able to be communicated with and even communicate back in their own way? And if so, what would they say?
While it's difficult to train a dog to do something such as express their feelings, a service animal might be able to use their training to communicate ideas about concrete objects and ideas. "I see three people and one chair in this room," certainly doesn't seem to be beyond the understanding of a sufficiently (and extensively) trained dog given the circumstances surrounding this experiment. Of course I wouldn't then also expect the same dog to be able to say something along the lines of, "I don't know about that carpet. It doesn't seem to go well with the color scheme you have in here." If for no other reason than dogs are colorblind.
In the beginning, dogs were thought to be dumb but trainable animals. And as we continued to study them we discovered that their capacity for language was practically without horizon. So how long before we truly understand just how far the canine consciousness can parallel our own?
